Here is the fifth CFB SBPI installment of the 2015
season. To read more about how I
calculate my ratings look back at this
entry that also has links to other entries surrounding this topic.
Without further ado here are the Top 25 rankings through
action on Saturday November 7. The
columns OFF/DEF/TOTAL represent where each team statistically ranks across 128
teams in the FBS; we also included ESPN’s FPI & Sagarin’s rankings which
can be used as a solid comparison tool followed by each team’s SOS adjusted
RATING and RANK:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
Clemson
|
10
|
7
|
1
|
6
|
2
|
292.5
|
1
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Alabama
|
48
|
2
|
7
|
4
|
1
|
276.6
|
2
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Stanford
|
13
|
26
|
10
|
11
|
8
|
257.8
|
3
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Oklahoma
|
7
|
20
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
253.7
|
4
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Notre Dame
|
10
|
44
|
14
|
9
|
7
|
251.7
|
5
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
Iowa
|
32
|
8
|
6
|
29
|
16
|
250.6
|
6
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Florida
|
62
|
6
|
13
|
14
|
12
|
243.8
|
7
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
TCU
|
2
|
52
|
12
|
3
|
6
|
239.7
|
8
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
Ohio State
|
28
|
10
|
7
|
5
|
5
|
237.9
|
9
|
||
|
7
|
1
|
LSU
|
19
|
41
|
23
|
|
8
|
11
|
|
237.7
|
10
|
|
7
|
2
|
Boise State
|
25
|
4
|
3
|
25
|
26
|
235.5
|
11
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
Utah
|
43
|
27
|
27
|
22
|
14
|
231.6
|
12
|
||
|
6
|
3
|
USC
|
17
|
60
|
36
|
7
|
10
|
229.3
|
13
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
Michigan
|
82
|
3
|
17
|
16
|
13
|
227.2
|
14
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
Mississippi State
|
22
|
34
|
17
|
15
|
17
|
225.7
|
15
|
||
|
5
|
4
|
Arkansas
|
2
|
85
|
40
|
26
|
32
|
224.4
|
16
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
BYU
|
45
|
23
|
23
|
46
|
37
|
222.0
|
17
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
Oklahoma State
|
28
|
29
|
20
|
13
|
9
|
221.0
|
18
|
||
|
6
|
3
|
Georgia
|
69
|
11
|
26
|
20
|
25
|
219.0
|
19
|
||
|
5
|
4
|
Tennessee
|
35
|
57
|
46
|
12
|
18
|
218.4
|
20
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
Houston
|
5
|
19
|
2
|
35
|
24
|
218.1
|
21
|
||
|
5
|
4
|
Louisville
|
85
|
14
|
37
|
38
|
35
|
217.3
|
22
|
||
|
8
|
2
|
Wisconsin
|
69
|
4
|
14
|
24
|
20
|
216.8
|
23
|
||
|
7
|
3
|
Mississippi
|
23
|
51
|
35
|
10
|
15
|
216.6
|
24
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
Florida State
|
33
|
38
|
29
|
|
18
|
19
|
|
214.6
|
25
|
Currently there is 83%
correlation between SBPI ranking & wins & that correlation has
increased each week
Breakdown of Top
25 by conference:
|
AAC
|
1
|
|
ACC
|
3
|
|
B10
|
4
|
|
B12
|
3
|
|
CUSA
|
0
|
|
IND
|
2
|
|
MAC
|
0
|
|
MWC
|
1
|
|
P12
|
3
|
|
SEC
|
8
|
|
SUN
|
0
|
Here are
additional teams of note that did not make the SBPI Top 25 but were ranked
inside the Top 25 of at least one of the other two power rating sources I use
for comparative purposes:
#28 North Carolina (#19 FPI, #21 SAG)
#29 Michigan State (#21 FPI, #22 SAG)
#30 UCLA (#17 FPI, #23 SAG)
#33 Baylor (#2 FPI, #4 SAG)
#55 Texas A&M (#23 FPI)
Here are the five
lowest rated SBPI teams that have a winning record:
#105 New Mexico (faced 122nd toughest schedule)
#92 Tulsa (faced 93rd toughest schedule)
#90 Nevada (faced 120th toughest schedule)
#89 Georgia Southern (faced 116th toughest
schedule)
#85 Buffalo (faced 113th toughest schedule)
Strength of each
conference taking average RATING of ALL TEAMS:
|
SEC
|
80.51
|
|
IND
|
80.48
|
|
ACC
|
79.11
|
|
P12
|
78.33
|
|
B10
|
77.72
|
|
B12
|
76.21
|
|
AAC
|
72.02
|
|
MWC
|
71.04
|
|
MAC
|
69.98
|
|
CUSA
|
66.62
|
|
SUN
|
64.90
|
Next up let’s look
at the Top 10 non-Power 5 conference teams (excluding Notre Dame):
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
MWC
|
Boise State
|
25
|
4
|
3
|
26
|
235.5
|
11
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
IND
|
BYU
|
45
|
23
|
23
|
37
|
222.0
|
17
|
||
|
9
|
0
|
AAC
|
Houston
|
5
|
19
|
2
|
24
|
218.1
|
21
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
AAC
|
Temple
|
51
|
9
|
11
|
39
|
204.5
|
32
|
||
|
5
|
4
|
AAC
|
Cincinnati
|
17
|
54
|
32
|
56
|
200.8
|
34
|
||
|
5
|
4
|
MWC
|
Utah State
|
72
|
16
|
34
|
59
|
200.0
|
36
|
||
|
6
|
3
|
MWC
|
Air Force
|
30
|
11
|
9
|
70
|
198.3
|
38
|
||
|
7
|
2
|
SB
|
Appalachian State
|
9
|
23
|
5
|
65
|
195.6
|
39
|
||
|
6
|
3
|
MWC
|
San Diego State
|
62
|
13
|
23
|
60
|
192.2
|
42
|
||
|
8
|
1
|
AAC
|
Memphis
|
6
|
85
|
41
|
38
|
191.7
|
43
|
||
Here are the
Bottom 10 teams:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
2
|
7
|
CUSA
|
Charlotte
|
117
|
83
|
113
|
128
|
85.2
|
119
|
||
|
4
|
5
|
CUSA
|
Old Dominion
|
101
|
110
|
116
|
122
|
84.1
|
120
|
||
|
2
|
8
|
MAC
|
Miami (Ohio)
|
122
|
95
|
120
|
123
|
82.2
|
121
|
||
|
2
|
6
|
SB
|
Texas State
|
85
|
128
|
119
|
116
|
79.9
|
122
|
||
|
1
|
8
|
SB
|
Louisiana-Monroe
|
120
|
114
|
123
|
119
|
69.1
|
123
|
||
|
2
|
7
|
MWC
|
Fresno State
|
124
|
117
|
125
|
109
|
66.3
|
124
|
||
|
1
|
8
|
CUSA
|
North Texas
|
109
|
127
|
124
|
126
|
64.9
|
125
|
||
|
0
|
9
|
B12
|
Kansas
|
120
|
125
|
127
|
115
|
63.2
|
126
|
||
|
2
|
8
|
MWC
|
Hawai'i
|
128
|
99
|
126
|
113
|
60.2
|
127
|
||
|
0
|
10
|
AAC
|
UCF
|
127
|
121
|
128
|
114
|
43.5
|
128
|
||
Lastly here are
the Bottom 5 Power 5 conference teams:
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
|||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
3
|
6
|
ACC
|
Virginia
|
98
|
108
|
111
|
71
|
121.8
|
98
|
||
|
3
|
6
|
ACC
|
Wake Forest
|
122
|
62
|
105
|
88
|
116.2
|
102
|
||
|
2
|
7
|
B10
|
Purdue
|
115
|
101
|
118
|
94
|
99.3
|
109
|
||
|
2
|
7
|
P12
|
Oregon State
|
117
|
106
|
121
|
92
|
94.0
|
113
|
||
|
0
|
9
|
B12
|
Kansas
|
120
|
125
|
127
|
115
|
63.2
|
126
|
||
Thanks again for reading, please feel free to:
Email me directly: boss@thesportsboss.com
Visit my website: www.thesportsboss.com
Follow me on Twitter: @SportsBoss
COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment