Here is
the INITIAL CFB SBPI installment of the 2016 season! To read more about how I calculate my ratings
look back at this entry that
also has links to other entries surrounding this topic.
Without
further ado here are the Top 25 rankings through Week Six. The columns OFF/DEF/TOTAL represent
where each team statistically ranks across 128 teams in the FBS; we also
included Sagarin’s rankings which can be used as a solid comparison tool
followed by each team’s SOS adjusted RATING and RANK:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
B10
|
Michigan
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
287.4
|
1
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
SEC
|
Alabama
|
10
|
10
|
4
|
2
|
287.2
|
2
|
||
|
5
|
0
|
B10
|
Ohio State
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
278.4
|
3
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
ACC
|
Clemson
|
30
|
7
|
11
|
4
|
275.6
|
4
|
||
|
4
|
2
|
P12
|
Colorado
|
5
|
12
|
5
|
27
|
271.8
|
5
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
ACC
|
Virginia Tech
|
29
|
3
|
7
|
12
|
259.3
|
6
|
||
|
4
|
2
|
SEC
|
Auburn
|
24
|
27
|
21
|
10
|
256.3
|
7
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
ACC
|
Louisville
|
4
|
31
|
13
|
6
|
253.8
|
8
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
ACC
|
North Carolina State
|
12
|
8
|
3
|
36
|
247.7
|
9
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
SEC
|
Florida
|
33
|
1
|
6
|
|
20
|
|
245.0
|
10
|
|
5
|
0
|
B10
|
Nebraska
|
5
|
18
|
9
|
22
|
240.0
|
11
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
P12
|
Washington
|
5
|
15
|
7
|
5
|
239.8
|
12
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
ACC
|
Miami (Florida)
|
30
|
9
|
13
|
17
|
238.8
|
13
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
SEC
|
LSU
|
71
|
11
|
27
|
9
|
238.4
|
14
|
||
|
5
|
1
|
AAC
|
Houston
|
22
|
12
|
13
|
16
|
231.1
|
15
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
SEC
|
Texas A&M
|
41
|
35
|
34
|
7
|
230.1
|
16
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
B10
|
Wisconsin
|
96
|
6
|
30
|
14
|
229.8
|
17
|
||
|
4
|
2
|
ACC
|
Florida State
|
16
|
100
|
48
|
13
|
224.3
|
18
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
B12
|
Oklahoma
|
21
|
91
|
48
|
11
|
223.0
|
19
|
||
|
5
|
1
|
P12
|
Utah
|
37
|
26
|
22
|
37
|
222.0
|
20
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
MAC
|
Western Michigan
|
1
|
43
|
17
|
28
|
221.5
|
21
|
||
|
2
|
3
|
SEC
|
Missouri
|
22
|
37
|
23
|
51
|
221.5
|
22
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
P12
|
Washington State
|
18
|
67
|
31
|
19
|
216.2
|
23
|
||
|
4
|
2
|
SEC
|
Arkansas
|
20
|
61
|
34
|
31
|
216.1
|
24
|
||
|
4
|
2
|
ACC
|
Pittsburgh
|
14
|
74
|
31
|
|
41
|
|
215.6
|
25
|
Currently there is a 74.2% correlation between the SBPI
ratings and team records. That figure
typically increases as we progress through the season; last year the final
rankings correlated to records at an 87.3% clip.
Breakdown of Top
25 by conference:
|
AAC
|
1
|
|
ACC
|
7
|
|
B10
|
4
|
|
B12
|
1
|
|
CUSA
|
0
|
|
IND
|
0
|
|
MAC
|
1
|
|
MWC
|
0
|
|
P12
|
4
|
|
SEC
|
7
|
|
SUN
|
0
|
Additional teams
of note that missed out on the SBPI Top 25:
#27 Baylor 5-0
#30 Tennessee 5-1
#34 West Virginia 4-0
#35 Boise State 4-0
#51 Wake Forest 5-1
#61 Maryland 4-1
#63 Oregon 2-4
#70 Arizona State 5-1
#72 Stanford 3-2
#82 Notre Dame 2-4
Strength of each
conference taking average SBPI RATING of ALL TEAMS:
|
ACC
|
81.56
|
|
SEC
|
80.99
|
|
P12
|
79.53
|
|
B10
|
78.31
|
|
IND
|
76.63
|
|
B12
|
76.41
|
|
AAC
|
74.43
|
|
MWC
|
69.59
|
|
MAC
|
69.05
|
|
SUN
|
66.74
|
|
CUSA
|
66.30
|
Top 10 Group of
Five teams:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
5
|
1
|
AAC
|
Houston
|
22
|
12
|
13
|
16
|
231.1
|
15
|
||
|
6
|
0
|
MAC
|
Western Michigan
|
1
|
43
|
17
|
28
|
221.5
|
21
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
MAC
|
Toledo
|
3
|
24
|
10
|
43
|
213.9
|
26
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
MWC
|
San Diego State
|
24
|
18
|
18
|
64
|
204.6
|
29
|
||
|
4
|
1
|
SB
|
Troy
|
12
|
22
|
12
|
62
|
202.7
|
31
|
||
|
5
|
1
|
AAC
|
South Florida
|
10
|
61
|
25
|
34
|
202.4
|
33
|
||
|
4
|
0
|
MWC
|
Boise State
|
33
|
41
|
28
|
23
|
200.1
|
35
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
IND
|
Army
|
63
|
4
|
19
|
68
|
194.9
|
37
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
SB
|
Appalachian State
|
62
|
37
|
43
|
66
|
194.8
|
38
|
||
|
3
|
3
|
IND
|
BYU
|
56
|
72
|
63
|
39
|
193.8
|
39
|
||
Bottom 10 teams:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
1
|
4
|
SB
|
Arkansas State
|
114
|
120
|
122
|
101
|
84.5
|
119
|
||
|
1
|
5
|
MWC
|
Fresno State
|
118
|
111
|
120
|
113
|
84.5
|
120
|
||
|
2
|
3
|
SB
|
New Mexico State
|
97
|
123
|
118
|
125
|
84.3
|
121
|
||
|
2
|
3
|
SB
|
Texas State
|
102
|
127
|
121
|
124
|
84.3
|
122
|
||
|
1
|
5
|
IND
|
Massachusetts
|
128
|
101
|
124
|
112
|
78.1
|
123
|
||
|
0
|
5
|
CUSA
|
Rice
|
117
|
123
|
125
|
119
|
77.3
|
124
|
||
|
3
|
3
|
SB
|
Idaho
|
121
|
118
|
126
|
118
|
73.4
|
125
|
||
|
1
|
5
|
CUSA
|
Florida Atlantic
|
119
|
114
|
122
|
121
|
73.0
|
126
|
||
|
1
|
5
|
CUSA
|
UTEP
|
119
|
126
|
127
|
127
|
62.9
|
127
|
||
|
1
|
5
|
MAC
|
Bowling Green
|
125
|
128
|
128
|
117
|
52.5
|
128
|
||
Bottom five Power
5 conference teams:
|
RECORD
|
UNIT RANKS RAW
|
RANKS
|
SOS ADJ #'s
|
||||||||
|
WINS
|
LOSS
|
CONF
|
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
||
|
2
|
4
|
SEC
|
South Carolina
|
127
|
55
|
110
|
73
|
125.4
|
99
|
||
|
3
|
3
|
SEC
|
Kentucky
|
101
|
103
|
110
|
74
|
121.2
|
102
|
||
|
1
|
4
|
B12
|
Kansas
|
112
|
91
|
112
|
102
|
119.5
|
105
|
||
|
3
|
2
|
B10
|
Purdue
|
86
|
101
|
101
|
98
|
115.9
|
110
|
||
|
2
|
4
|
B10
|
Rutgers
|
123
|
106
|
119
|
106
|
110.7
|
112
|
||
Thanks again for reading, please feel free to:
Email me directly: boss@thesportsboss.com
Visit my website: www.thesportsboss.com
Follow me on Twitter: @SportsBoss
COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment