Here are the Top 25 rankings through yesterday’s inaugural
CFB Championship Game. The columns
OFF/DEF/TOTAL represent where each team checks in statistically in each; we also
include the AP Poll, ESPN’s FPI & Sagarin’s rankings which can all be used
as a solid comparison tool followed by each team’s SOS adjusted RATING, RANK
& SU record:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
SU
|
Alabama
|
5
|
14
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
299.6
|
1
|
12-2
|
Michigan State
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
5
|
7
|
6
|
285.9
|
2
|
11-2
|
Ohio State
|
3
|
10
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
279.4
|
3
|
14-1
|
TCU
|
6
|
7
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
274.0
|
4
|
12-1
|
Georgia
|
8
|
25
|
5
|
9
|
5
|
5
|
270.8
|
5
|
10-3
|
Auburn
|
6
|
69
|
19
|
22
|
8
|
11
|
251.9
|
6
|
8-5
|
Arkansas
|
25
|
28
|
14
|
15
|
10
|
251.5
|
7
|
7-6
|
|
Stanford
|
55
|
4
|
11
|
14
|
18
|
243.5
|
8
|
8-5
|
|
Baylor
|
3
|
35
|
7
|
7
|
6
|
7
|
241.9
|
9
|
11-2
|
Mississippi State
|
9
|
41
|
13
|
11
|
10
|
9
|
241.9
|
10
|
10-3
|
Mississippi
|
68
|
11
|
22
|
17
|
9
|
8
|
240.6
|
11
|
9-4
|
Clemson
|
55
|
3
|
8
|
15
|
21
|
13
|
238.1
|
12
|
10-3
|
LSU
|
53
|
17
|
24
|
17
|
14
|
237.9
|
13
|
8-5
|
|
Louisville
|
71
|
2
|
12
|
24
|
30
|
234.0
|
14
|
9-4
|
|
Oregon
|
2
|
71
|
17
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
232.4
|
15
|
13-2
|
USC
|
15
|
44
|
18
|
20
|
13
|
21
|
230.4
|
16
|
9-4
|
Boise State
|
12
|
16
|
5
|
16
|
35
|
225.4
|
17
|
12-2
|
|
Florida
|
87
|
6
|
30
|
22
|
26
|
219.7
|
18
|
7-5
|
|
Miami (Florida)
|
43
|
26
|
22
|
40
|
219.5
|
19
|
6-7
|
||
UCLA
|
20
|
67
|
39
|
10
|
12
|
19
|
219.2
|
20
|
10-3
|
West Virginia
|
36
|
40
|
32
|
32
|
218.4
|
21
|
7-6
|
||
Wisconsin
|
61
|
12
|
20
|
13
|
20
|
20
|
216.2
|
22
|
11-3
|
Missouri
|
72
|
26
|
44
|
14
|
15
|
209.5
|
23
|
11-3
|
|
Nebraska
|
36
|
30
|
24
|
29
|
207.6
|
24
|
9-4
|
||
Kansas State
|
27
|
55
|
36
|
18
|
18
|
17
|
207.6
|
25
|
9-4
|
Here are an additional few teams of note that did not make
the SBPI Top 25:
#26 Oklahoma
#27 Georgia Tech
#34 Arizona State
#35 Texas A&M
#45 Utah
#57 Florida State
#65 Arizona
Breakdown of Top 25 by conference:
AAC
|
0
|
|
ACC
|
3
|
|
B10
|
4
|
|
B12
|
4
|
|
CUSA
|
0
|
|
IND
|
0
|
|
MAC
|
0
|
|
MWC
|
1
|
|
P12
|
4
|
|
SEC
|
9
|
|
SUN
|
0
|
Strength of each conference taking average ranking of ALL
TEAMS:
SEC
|
28.50
|
P12
|
45.00
|
ACC
|
47.00
|
B12
|
52.90
|
B10
|
55.07
|
IND
|
68.00
|
MWC
|
80.58
|
CUSA
|
81.15
|
AAC
|
83.45
|
SUN
|
88.55
|
MAC
|
90.23
|
Next up let’s look at the Top 10 non-Power 5 conference
teams:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
USAT
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
|
Boise State
|
12
|
16
|
5
|
16
|
35
|
225.4
|
17
|
|||
Memphis
|
40
|
9
|
8
|
25
|
38
|
196.3
|
30
|
|||
Marshall
|
12
|
30
|
10
|
23
|
24
|
23
|
194.2
|
32
|
||
Louisiana Tech
|
49
|
20
|
24
|
33
|
193.3
|
33
|
||||
BYU
|
36
|
41
|
34
|
53
|
186.0
|
36
|
||||
Utah State
|
70
|
12
|
27
|
50
|
183.8
|
41
|
||||
East Carolina
|
31
|
32
|
21
|
61
|
183.4
|
42
|
||||
Western Michigan
|
16
|
39
|
16
|
80
|
182.4
|
43
|
||||
UCF
|
82
|
7
|
29
|
55
|
176.8
|
49
|
||||
Colorado State
|
16
|
69
|
36
|
62
|
174.7
|
50
|
Lastly here are the Bottom 10 teams according to College
Football SBPI:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
USAT
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
|
Idaho
|
94
|
113
|
113
|
122
|
87.1
|
119
|
||||
Vanderbilt
|
125
|
96
|
124
|
98
|
84.4
|
120
|
||||
Georgia State
|
92
|
123
|
119
|
126
|
83.0
|
121
|
||||
Connecticut
|
126
|
75
|
120
|
125
|
80.7
|
122
|
||||
South Florida
|
124
|
94
|
122
|
114
|
79.0
|
123
|
||||
Kent State
|
118
|
100
|
121
|
120
|
74.7
|
124
|
||||
Southern Mississippi
|
115
|
117
|
126
|
110
|
71.9
|
125
|
||||
UNLV
|
115
|
116
|
125
|
121
|
69.1
|
126
|
||||
Eastern Michigan
|
122
|
128
|
127
|
128
|
44.9
|
127
|
||||
SMU
|
128
|
127
|
128
|
127
|
37.4
|
128
|
For each of comparison remember I have adjusted “SAG” ranks
to just show FBS/1A teams – that gives a better feel for where he ranks the FCS
teams compared to the College Football SBPI.
Thanks again for reading, please feel free to:
Email me directly: boss@thesportsboss.com
Visit my website: www.thesportsboss.com
Follow me on Twitter: @SportsBoss
COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment