Here are the Top 25 rankings through action on Saturday November
29. The columns OFF/DEF/TOTAL represent
where each team checks in statistically in each; we also include the AP Poll,
USA Today Poll, ESPN’s FPI & Sagarin’s rankings which can all be used as a
solid comparison tool followed by each team’s SOS adjusted RATING, RANK &
SU record:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
USAT
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
SU
|
Alabama
|
5
|
11
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
308.9
|
1
|
11-1
|
Michigan State
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
7
|
7
|
12
|
10
|
288.2
|
2
|
10-2
|
Georgia
|
6
|
32
|
7
|
15
|
15
|
4
|
6
|
269.2
|
3
|
9-3
|
Auburn
|
6
|
60
|
20
|
20
|
21
|
6
|
7
|
266.4
|
4
|
8-4
|
TCU
|
8
|
18
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
3
|
263.2
|
5
|
10-1
|
Mississippi
|
49
|
9
|
14
|
13
|
14
|
3
|
2
|
262.9
|
6
|
9-3
|
Ohio State
|
3
|
14
|
3
|
6
|
6
|
9
|
13
|
261.5
|
7
|
11-1
|
Mississippi State
|
11
|
30
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
4
|
257.7
|
8
|
10-2
|
LSU
|
64
|
15
|
29
|
23
|
24
|
14
|
11
|
249.5
|
9
|
8-4
|
Arkansas
|
28
|
46
|
35
|
18
|
14
|
246.1
|
10
|
6-6
|
||
Baylor
|
1
|
24
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
8
|
245.8
|
11
|
10-1
|
USC
|
16
|
42
|
15
|
13
|
19
|
241.3
|
12
|
8-4
|
||
Louisville
|
60
|
2
|
9
|
21
|
20
|
29
|
239.7
|
13
|
9-3
|
|
Wisconsin
|
42
|
4
|
8
|
11
|
11
|
16
|
15
|
239.5
|
14
|
10-2
|
Stanford
|
66
|
7
|
17
|
17
|
27
|
239.0
|
15
|
7-5
|
||
West Virginia
|
34
|
35
|
26
|
28
|
236.1
|
16
|
7-5
|
|||
Boise State
|
9
|
18
|
6
|
22
|
22
|
33
|
235.1
|
17
|
10-2
|
|
Clemson
|
62
|
4
|
13
|
19
|
19
|
24
|
25
|
232.3
|
18
|
9-3
|
Kansas State
|
22
|
37
|
19
|
9
|
9
|
19
|
12
|
229.3
|
19
|
9-2
|
Florida
|
87
|
8
|
39
|
22
|
22
|
226.0
|
20
|
6-5
|
||
Miami (Florida)
|
37
|
29
|
23
|
39
|
225.5
|
21
|
6-6
|
|||
Oregon
|
3
|
74
|
23
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
223.4
|
22
|
11-1
|
Missouri
|
69
|
16
|
35
|
14
|
13
|
16
|
221.7
|
23
|
10-2
|
|
Oklahoma
|
43
|
38
|
38
|
18
|
16
|
7
|
9
|
221.2
|
24
|
8-3
|
Georgia Tech
|
11
|
68
|
33
|
12
|
12
|
21
|
18
|
213.1
|
25
|
10-2
|
Here are an additional few teams of note that did not make
the SBPI Top 25:
#26 UCLA
#28 Nebraska
#30 Arizona State
#44 Arizona
#52 Florida State
#53 Minnesota
#56 Utah
New breakdown we will add each week is showing where each
Top 25 team ranked in the week’s prior SBPI:
Team
|
Wk7
|
Wk8
|
Wk9
|
Wk10
|
Wk11
|
Wk12
|
Wk13
|
Wk14
|
Wk15
|
Alabama
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Michigan State
|
5
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Georgia
|
19
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Auburn
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
7
|
6
|
4
|
TCU
|
7
|
12
|
7
|
10
|
9
|
7
|
8
|
8
|
5
|
Mississippi
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
7
|
6
|
Ohio State
|
12
|
13
|
10
|
7
|
5
|
8
|
6
|
5
|
7
|
Mississippi State
|
9
|
7
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
14
|
10
|
9
|
8
|
LSU
|
17
|
10
|
13
|
12
|
8
|
9
|
12
|
13
|
9
|
Arkansas
|
27
|
20
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
15
|
10
|
10
|
Baylor
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
11
|
USC
|
11
|
9
|
12
|
11
|
15
|
12
|
13
|
20
|
12
|
Louisville
|
18
|
17
|
18
|
21
|
20
|
15
|
14
|
11
|
13
|
Wisconsin
|
28
|
33
|
33
|
24
|
23
|
18
|
16
|
15
|
14
|
Stanford
|
16
|
15
|
19
|
18
|
22
|
19
|
18
|
19
|
15
|
West Virginia
|
13
|
18
|
15
|
14
|
13
|
11
|
11
|
12
|
16
|
Boise State
|
33
|
35
|
28
|
19
|
19
|
20
|
24
|
16
|
17
|
Clemson
|
4
|
8
|
11
|
9
|
11
|
13
|
17
|
21
|
18
|
Kansas State
|
24
|
26
|
21
|
22
|
17
|
23
|
21
|
25
|
19
|
Florida
|
31
|
31
|
30
|
29
|
26
|
24
|
23
|
18
|
20
|
Miami (Florida)
|
36
|
25
|
20
|
16
|
14
|
10
|
9
|
14
|
21
|
Oregon
|
30
|
34
|
26
|
27
|
25
|
21
|
19
|
22
|
22
|
Missouri
|
21
|
44
|
40
|
34
|
31
|
30
|
25
|
23
|
23
|
Oklahoma
|
10
|
19
|
16
|
17
|
12
|
17
|
22
|
24
|
24
|
Georgia Tech
|
40
|
48
|
52
|
49
|
40
|
34
|
32
|
29
|
25
|
Breakdown of Top 25 by conference:
AAC
|
0
|
|
ACC
|
4
|
|
B10
|
3
|
|
B12
|
5
|
|
CUSA
|
0
|
|
IND
|
0
|
|
MAC
|
0
|
|
MWC
|
1
|
|
P12
|
3
|
|
SEC
|
9
|
|
SUN
|
0
|
Strength of each conference taking average ranking of ALL
TEAMS:
SEC
|
27.50
|
P12
|
43.58
|
ACC
|
47.29
|
B12
|
48.20
|
B10
|
55.07
|
IND
|
72.75
|
MWC
|
76.92
|
CUSA
|
83.69
|
AAC
|
85.73
|
SUN
|
90.09
|
MAC
|
92.08
|
Biggest MOVERS in overall ranking since last week (minimum 10 spot change in ranking):
Team
|
Wk14
|
Wk15
|
Change
|
Notre Dame
|
31
|
50
|
(19)
|
Rice
|
56
|
74
|
(18)
|
North Carolina State
|
66
|
49
|
17
|
Illinois
|
113
|
97
|
16
|
Marshall
|
30
|
45
|
(15)
|
Ball State
|
110
|
96
|
14
|
Kansas
|
104
|
116
|
(12)
|
North Carolina
|
73
|
84
|
(11)
|
Akron
|
92
|
103
|
(11)
|
Louisiana Tech
|
43
|
33
|
10
|
Boston College
|
47
|
37
|
10
|
UAB
|
80
|
70
|
10
|
Northwestern
|
71
|
81
|
(10)
|
Massachusetts
|
102
|
112
|
(10)
|
Next up let’s look at the Top 10 non-Power 5 conference
teams:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
USAT
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
Boise State
|
9
|
18
|
6
|
22
|
22
|
33
|
235.1
|
17
|
|
Louisiana Tech
|
37
|
22
|
22
|
47
|
193.6
|
33
|
|||
BYU
|
30
|
44
|
35
|
48
|
192.0
|
34
|
|||
Memphis
|
34
|
9
|
11
|
41
|
191.7
|
35
|
|||
Utah State
|
68
|
17
|
34
|
54
|
186.3
|
40
|
|||
East Carolina
|
22
|
32
|
16
|
60
|
184.4
|
41
|
|||
Colorado State
|
13
|
65
|
32
|
46
|
183.4
|
43
|
|||
Marshall
|
10
|
40
|
12
|
32
|
183.0
|
45
|
|||
Air Force
|
19
|
49
|
29
|
73
|
180.3
|
47
|
|||
Western Michigan
|
17
|
40
|
17
|
76
|
180.1
|
48
|
Lastly here are the Bottom 10 teams according to College
Football SBPI:
Team
|
OFF
|
DEF
|
TOTAL
|
AP
|
USAT
|
FPI
|
SAG
|
RATING
|
RANK
|
Idaho
|
96
|
113
|
114
|
121
|
87.5
|
119
|
|||
Vanderbilt
|
125
|
96
|
124
|
97
|
86.0
|
120
|
|||
Georgia State
|
93
|
124
|
119
|
126
|
82.6
|
121
|
|||
Connecticut
|
126
|
79
|
120
|
123
|
81.5
|
122
|
|||
South Florida
|
123
|
94
|
122
|
114
|
79.0
|
123
|
|||
Kent State
|
118
|
99
|
121
|
122
|
74.2
|
124
|
|||
UNLV
|
115
|
116
|
125
|
120
|
70.9
|
125
|
|||
Southern Mississippi
|
115
|
117
|
126
|
113
|
70.6
|
126
|
|||
Eastern Michigan
|
121
|
128
|
127
|
127
|
44.2
|
127
|
|||
SMU
|
128
|
127
|
128
|
128
|
33.3
|
128
|
For each of comparison remember I have adjusted “SAG” ranks
to just show FBS/1A teams – that gives a better feel for where he ranks the FCS
teams compared to the College Football SBPI.
Thanks again for reading, please feel free to:
Email me directly: boss@thesportsboss.com
Visit my website: www.thesportsboss.com
Follow me on Twitter: @SportsBoss
COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment