Tuesday, July 23, 2013

NFL 2013: Coaching Changes from Prior Season

My latest NFL 2013 Preview entry identifies all changes at either Head Coach, Offensive Coordinator or Defensive Coordinator for every NFL team entering the upcoming season.  I lay out each change by team, label what positions the new coach had over the prior 3 years, discuss each coaches NFL ties, and lastly call out weeks where this new coach could potentially have some insider information making it easier for his new team to game-plan for an opponent.  Remember, while these relationships are key and can certainly assist a team in preparing for a specific opponent, generally, these coaches also need good teams and the right personnel to take advantage of this edge.

TEAM COACH PRIOR JOBS*** Wk of Gm vs Prior Tm NOTES
BEARS
HC MARC TRESTMAN CFL HC NOT BEEN IN NFL S '04 MIA
OC AARON KROMER SAINTS OL 5 IN NFC SOUTH S '05
DC MEL TUCKER JAGUARS DC
BILLS
HC DOUG MARRONE SYRACUSE HC OC FOR SAINTS '06-'08
OC N. HACKETT SYRACUSE OC/QB SON OF PAUL HACKETT
DC MIKE PETTINE JETS DC 3 & 11 BAL & NYJ DEF S '02
BROWNS
HC R. CHUDZINSKI PANTHERS OC / CHARGERS TE BROWNS OC '07-'08
OC NORV TURNER CHARGERS HC NO PRIOR NFC NORTH EXP
DC RAY HORTON CARDINALS DC / STEELERS DB NA / 12 & 17 STEELERS DB COACH '04-'10
CARDINALS
HC BRUCE ARIANS COLTS HC 12 EXCLUSIVELY AFC EXP
OC H. GOODWIN COLTS OL / STEELERS OL 12 / NA WORKING W OL'S S '04
DC TODD BOWLES EAGLES DC / DOLPHINS DB DB COACH S '00
CHARGERS
HC MIKE MCCOY BRONCOS OC 10 & 15 PANTHERS '00-'08
OC K. WHISENHUNT CARDINALS HC STEELERS & CARDS S '00
CHIEFS
HC ANDY REID EAGLES HC 3 PLAYS NFC EAST THIS YR
OC DOUG PEDERSON EAGLES QB 3 2YRS QBC, NOTHING PRIOR
DC BOB SUTTON JETS DC / JETS LB JETS S '00
EAGLES
HC CHIP KELLY OREGON HC 1ST NFL EXP
OC PAT SHURMUR BROWNS HC / RAMS OC WORKED W EAGLES '99-'08
DC BILLY DAVIS BROWNS LC / CARDINALS DC NA / 13 WORKING IN NFC S '00
JAGUARS
HC GUS BRADLEY SEAHAWKS DC 3 ONLY WORKED IN NFC
OC JEDD FISCH U MIAMI OC / SEAHAWKS QB NA / 3
DC BOB BABICH BEARS LB WITH BEARS S '04

PANTHERS
OC MIKE SHULA PANTHERS QB / JAGUARS QB LOTS OF NFL EXP S '88
COWBOYS
DC MONTE KIFFIN USC DC BUCS DC '96-'08 THEN NCAA
BRONCOS
OC ADAM GASE BRONCOS QB LIMITED EXP WITH DET & SF
COLTS
OC PEP HAMILTON STANFORD OC / WR PRIOR W NYJ, SF, CHI
SAINTS
DC ROB RYAN COWBOYS DB 10 PRIOR EXP W NE, OAK, CLE
JETS
OC M. MORNHINWEG EAGLES OC EAGLES S '03; NO AFC EXP
DC D. THURMAN JETS DB BAL & NYJ S '02
RAIDERS
OC GREG OLSON JAGUARS QB / BUCS OC 2 / NA NFC EXP S '03 / LY JAC
SEAHAWKS
DC DAN QUINN U OF FLA DC / SEAHAWKS DL NFL EXP W SF, NYJ, MIA, SEA
RAMS
DC TIM WALTON LIONS DB

If anyone has questions after reading this analysis please feel free to email me.


Thanks again for reading, please feel free to:
Email me directly: boss@thesportsboss.com
Visit my website: www.thesportsboss.com
Follow me on Twitter: @SportsBoss
Follow me on Facebook: The SportsBoss
Leave comments here on the blog



COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2013

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

NFL 2012 Season in Review: Profitable ATS Trends

In this article I will discuss some of the more profitable ATS trends some find useful as part of their handicapping exercise.  I particularly do not hold a lot of value in using these trends, but no question they can add value as a small piece of the handicapping puzzle – in particular, looking for team’s that have not had a lot of personnel turnover, especially focusing on coaching staff’s and QB’s.  Overall, I consider 4 years to be the absolute max trends such as this do stay somewhat relevant, but that estimation is flexible depending on many factors.

Legend: home favorites (HF), home underdogs (HD), road favorites (RF), road underdogs (RD)



4 YEARS : ''08-'11

2012



ATS


ATS

TEAM

TREND
W/L
WIN %
NOTES

W/L
WIN %
NOTES










NE
*
RD
6-2
75%


1-0
100%











NYJ
*
HF
11-16
41%


2-3
40%

NYJ
*
HD
4-1
80%
W 4 of 5 SU

1-2
33%
W 0 of 3 SU










PIT
*
RF
8-12
40%


1-4
20%

PIT
*
HD
2-0
100%
W 2 of 2 SU

-
-

PIT
*
RD
7-4
64%


2-1
67%
W 2 of 3 SU










BAL
*
HF
17-10
63%
W 25 of 27 SU

2-4
33%
W 5 of 6 SU
BAL
*
RD
10-7
59%


1-3
25%
W 0 of 4 SU










NYG
*
HF
12-16
43%


4-4
50%
W 6 of 8 SU
NYG
*
Road
18-13
58%


4-4
50%
W 3 of 8 SU










DAL
*
HF
12-17
41%


0-6
0%
W 3 of 6 SU
DAL
*
RF
6-10
38%


2-1
67%
W 2 of 3 SU
DAL
*
Favorite
18-27
40%


2-7
22%
W 5 of 9 SU










GB
*
HF
17-11
61%


5-3
63%
W 7 of 8 SU
GB
*
RF
12-9
57%


3-3
50%

GB
*
Favorite
29-20
59%


8-6
57%

GB
*
HD
3-0
100%


-
-

GB
*
RD
7-5
58%


1-1
50%

GB
*
Underdog
10-5
67%


1-1
50%

GB
*
Road
19-14
58%


4-4
50%

GB
*
Home
20-11
65%


5-3
63%











ATL
*
HF
19-8
70%


4-4
50%
W 7 of 8 SU
ATL
*
RF
9-5
64%


3-2
60%
W 4 of 5 SU
ATL
*
Favorite
28-13
68%


7-6
54%
W 11 of 13 SU










SD
*
RF
6-15
29%


1-1
50%

SD
*
RD
8-3
73%
W 6 of 11 SU

4-2
67%
W 3 of 6 SU










PHI
*
RD
6-3
67%
W 5 of 9 SU

3-3
50%
W 1 of 6 SU










CHI

RF
5-2
71%


3-2
60%
W 4 of 5 SU
CHI

RD
8-14
36%


1-2
33%
W 1 of 3 SU










NO
*
HF
19-9
68%
W 24 of 28 SU

2-3
40%
W 2 of 5 SU
NO
*
Favorite
30-18
63%


4-4
50%
W 4 of 8 SU










MIA

HF
7-12
37%


2-2
50%

MIA

HD
4-8
33%


2-1
67%

MIA

Home
11-20
35%


4-3
57%

MIA

RD
19-7
73%
W 13 of 26 SU

2-5
29%
W 2 of 7 SU










BUF

HF
6-10
38%


4-2
67%











CIN

HF
5-11
31%


2-3
40%
W 3 of 5 SU










CLE

HF
3-7
30%


1-1
50%











IND

RF
11-5
69%


2-0
100%











JAC

HF
6-11
35%


0-1
0%

JAC

HD
6-9
40%


2-5
29%
W 1 of 7 SU
JAC

Home
12-20
38%


2-6
25%

JAC

RD
11-16
41%


5-3
63%
W 1 of 8 SU
JAC

Underdog
17-25
40%


7-8
47%











DEN

HF
2-15
12%


5-2
71%
W 7 of 7 SU










KC

HF
3-10
23%


0-1
0%

KC

RF
1-2
33%


-
-

KC

Favorite
4-12
25%


0-1
0%

KC

RD
18-11
62%


2-6
25%

KC

HD
11-8
58%


3-4
43%

KC

Underdog
29-19
60%


5-10
33%











WAS

HF
2-8
20%


3-2
60%
W 3 of 5 SU










MIN

RD
9-13
41%


3-3
50%
W 3 of 6 SU










TB

HD
2-12
14%
W 2 of 14 SU

1-1
50%

TB

RD
16-12
57%


6-1
86%
W 3 of 7 SU










CAR

RF
5-0
100%


1-2
33%
W 1 of 3 SU
CAR

Favorite
17-9
65%


2-4
33%
W 1 of 3 SU
CAR

HD
3-7
30%


2-3
40%
W 2 of 5 SU
CAR

RD
10-17
37%


5-0
100%
W 3 of 5 SU
CAR

Underdog
13-24
35%
W 9 of 37 SU

7-3
70%
W 5 of 10 SU










SF

HF
15-6
71%
W 17 of 21 SU

3-5
38%
W 6 of 8 SU
SF

RD
12-8
60%


2-1
67%
W 2 of 3 SU










SEA

RD
9-19
32%


3-1
75%
W 2 of 4 SU










STL

HD
11-15
42%


4-2
67%
W 4 of 6 SU
STL

RD
12-18
40%


7-1
88%
W 3 of 8 SU
STL

Underdog
23-33
41%
W 9 of 56 SU

11-3
79%
W 7 of 14 SU

*indicates teams I identified before last season where I felt these ATS trends would be of the highest relevance.

Review & Analysis of 2012 Regular Season results
This analysis once again proved to be profitable and spot on for the most part, adding to our successful preview articles we published before last season. 
In the matrix above I have split the teams in three buckets:
  • the first bucket (NE, NYJ, PIT, BAL, NYG, DAL, GB, ATL) were teams I identified where these ATS trends were reliable, and these teams did not suffer any last second changes to their status before the 2012 regular season began
  • the second bucket (SD, PHI, CHI, NO) consists of three teams I identified as having reliable ATS trends going into the 2012 season, but they had either a significant event occur last season or this past offseason which shifts them down a notch from the first bucket teams
  • the third bucket is the remaining NFL teams and they all have not had enough consistency in key areas of their franchise to make these ATS trends too reliable when using them in a vacuum
When examining the first bucket teams, which are the teams these trends hold the highest significance with, the results were extremely favorable if you had strictly bet in the situations mentioned.  Overall this group had 11 winning trends vs. 4 losing trends, a solid, profitable performance (when calculating the 11-4 mark I have removed all trends where there were no instances in 2012 such as PIT as a home underdog, and also removed all situations where a team went exactly .500 during the 2012 regular season in a specific trend – for example NYG went 4-4 as home favorites & in road games).  Of the 8 teams listed in the first bucket, NE & PIT & GB & ATL all did not have a losing record in any one trend I identified, while the NYG went .500 in both so they were a wash; on the flip side Super Bowl Champion BAL posted a losing ATS record in both trends I identified for them, while NYJ & DAL each posted one losing trend mark (both of which were just one game under .500).  In summary of the first bucket teams we can see there are clear indicators of success or failure when simply breaking their ATS records into four high level categories (HF, HD, RF, RD) – which intuitively makes sense because these are some of the more stable, successful franchises in the NFL and their performance in certain spots over the years is more consistent than some may think.

Moving down to the second bucket teams, which is the last bucket we would suggest using trends such as these, there was more success as this group posted a mark of 3 winning trends vs. 1 losing trend.  CHI posted a perfect 2-0 mark as they performed well as a road favorite (a spot they have been solid in over 2008 to 2011 going 5-2 ATS), and they also performed subpar as a road underdog (a spot they have been losing in over 2008 to 2011 going just 8-14 ATS); SD continued playing well as a RD moving to 12-5 ATS over the last 5 full regular seasons; and NO was the lone losing proposition in this bucket as they posted just a 2-3 mark as a HF, an area they typically excelled posting a 19-9 mark from 2008 to 2011.  One key point in this grouping is all these teams either suffered a change of status before last season started (after I posted this article last summer), or over this most recent offseason:
  • SD: fired HC Norv Turner, new HC is former DEN OC Mike McCoy
  • PHI: fired HC Andy Reid, new HC is former Oregon HC Chip Kelly
  • CHI: fired HC Lovie Smith, new HC is former CFL HC & NFL OC Marc Trestman
  • NO: lost HC Sean Payton for the 2012 regular season due to suspension; he returns in 2013
The third bucket, which includes the remaining 20 NFL teams has not had enough consistency in key areas across the team and organization for these types of trends to hold a lot of relevance.  However, teams can slide up or down going into any season – more on this when we post our 2013 ATS Trends article, which will be coming out shortly.

Here we reviewed another preview article we posted heading into the 2012 regular season, and once again we hit a HOME RUN by identifying key & profitable ATS trends, properly grouping teams where they were relevant, leading to more winnings for our followers.  Of the 5 losing trends we identified from teams in bucket’s 1&2, three were just one game below .500, and the other pair were just two games below .500 – extremely close to being winners as well!

Check back next week when we continue our review of 2012 preview articles, and of course continue adding 2013 preview articles where we identify key areas/metrics to focus on when it’s time to handicap the games for this upcoming season.



COPYRIGHT: THE SPORTSBOSS, 2013